Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

RE: Saints: # of writeups vs. XPs

by cciulla (Friar)
on Apr 29, 2000 at 16:30 UTC ( #9707=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Saints: # of writeups vs. XPs

If you look at the ratio of Writeups to Experience, you can see who are the REAL contributors.

Since I'm just an opionated bastard, my Writeups/Experience ratio (signal to noise?) hovers around 0.5. I certainly don't belong above some (most?) of my monkish siblings.

Perhaps a solution to this conundrum is a sort order based upon signal/noise ratio?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Saints: # of writeups vs. XPs
by BBQ (Deacon) on May 02, 2000 at 08:53 UTC
    I've been doing some thinking (uh-oh)...

    Although there is a considerable amount of effort put into an answer, good questions should always deserve a fair ammount of XPs. If there were no clue-less monks in search of wisdom (such as myself), there would be no use for this site. Come to think of it, the term monk presupposes that one is in search of higher enlightenment.

    Rating based on signal/noise (as you put it) might discourage the ardent to pursue knowledge monks. I suppose only the higher saints should be listed in a signal/noise ratio, while the rest of us mortals be listed by XPs...
      You make a good point.

      Of course, if we are thinking in terms of Monks, then we should not be concerned with the chart-o-saints. Sadly, we are but mortals (except two Monks whose XP demonstrates otherwise) and we have this obsessive flaw. Fine. In that case, I like the idea of some formula that takes into account our XP and our number of posts. Maybe (warning... introducing work) there could be a way to differentiate questions from answers from comments. Questions would be worth a certain amount, Answers with a good reputation would be worth some other formulaic amount, and comments would be worthless (or worth less, depending on how you want to read that.)

      I'm not sure of a good formula yet... but the algorithm is begining to take shape in my head.

        Well, answers with a good reputation already are "rewarded" in the form of additional XP for the user who wrote them, as well as allowing "punishment" for nodes with a bad reputation.
RE: RE: Saints: # of writeups vs. XPs
by wonko (Pilgrim) on Apr 29, 2000 at 19:18 UTC
    Yeah divide the XP with the number of writeups, that way a person with a lot of good writeups will get a higher ranking. Even a person with few writeups ( and a relative low ranking) can get listed. It woud be a measure of quality on the writeups.

    Merlyn and vroom shoud like it, that way they will always get on top, in that order : )



Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://9707]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2023-06-09 07:07 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How often do you go to conferences?

    Results (35 votes). Check out past polls.