Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re^10: Should I upload it on CPAN?by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Mar 02, 2012 at 20:27 UTC ( [id://957546]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
but you and I both know you are manipulating it for effect. No. I am not. It is derived exactly as you see it. (That's exactly why I posted the code showing how it was derived; so I could not be so accused.) Does it represent just that subset of the Moose* you (perhaps uniquely) know to be the body of Moose. Apparently not, (though how would I know?), it comes attached to a full spread of rutt-time antlers. I appreciate the distinction which you've made before, but just as the good bits of rap (some jazz-rap fusion is astonishingly good), have a hard time segregating themselves from the less salubrious parts of the genre, that distinction is a very hard line to draw when installing other people's packages. once again you seem to forget, Moose is not to blame for the overkill, the author is. Actually, you are forgetting that in this thread, I was not attacking Moose. I was attacking the overkill of its use for the module in question. ... awesome ... "cool" ... scary ... These words are not a part of my vocabulary when deciding the appropriateness of the use of technologies. Wow, that is a pretty harsh words ... When you step into a fight with all guns blazing, don't be surprised if the incumbents turn their firepower in your direction. ... for which you have absolutely no basis. And yet, there it is, and remains, unanswered: a 176 line error message. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|