Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Feb 08, 2012 at 18:58 UTC ( [id://952558]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?
in thread RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?

This may point to your error (along with a bunch of other non-errors);...

... and a bunch of warnings in other places that aren't under your control. warnings has a lexical scope, while -w and -W affect the entire process.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?
by educated_foo (Vicar) on Feb 08, 2012 at 19:08 UTC
    ...and? Let's say you tried to log something undefined, so you passed it to your logging module. With "use warnings", you would see nothing; with "-w", you would get a message. Which do you prefer? (Or, perhaps, which is more "Modern"?)
      Which do you prefer?

      The version which respects encapsulation boundaries, of course.

      With "use warnings", you would see nothing; with "-w", you would get a message.

      Nope; my logging module uses warnings and reports only what's relevant.

        Okay, let's say you want to log undef as an empty string. Tragically, your "encapsulation boundaries" make this impossible. Oh, well.
          A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://952558]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-03-29 09:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found