Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^2: Moose performance

by jmcnamara (Monsignor)
on Nov 11, 2011 at 20:35 UTC ( #937667=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Moose performance
in thread Moose performance

Show your code. Show your measurement numbers for performance.

That isn't fair. You know what the issue is and it isn't right to try push it back on the OP to demonstrate the performance overhead of Moose.

Every time someone is surprised by the overhead of Moose in small short lived programs we seem to reply in the following sequence (where each one is admitted more grudgingly):

  • It is just the startup that is slow. Moose is fine for long lived programs.
  • You can use Mouse if you have to.
  • Moose isn't a good fit for short lived programs.

Perhaps it would be more honest if we replied in the reverse order.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Moose performance
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 12, 2011 at 02:01 UTC

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://937667]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (3)
As of 2020-10-27 07:16 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (256 votes). Check out past polls.