monkdiscuss
ww
<p>More re PM Bug? ... because I can't reply to that thread... and after preview and create, I get what I've written and posted <b>labeled</b> as written by another monk (and same ID as the other monk's prior reply) -- but then that content never shows in the thread. Seems to have jetted off somewhere (but not the bit bucket?).</p>
<p>Actually, same problem for me started with an attempt to reply to [New site for perl]... and I may have besmirched GrandFather's good reputation if my post ever actually shows up, since the rendered content after preview and create attributed comment to him:</p>
Thread: begins at New site for perl
<blockquote>GrandFather's: Re: New site for perl<br>
(His actual post: questions failure to mention PM as a resource)<br>
Mine, when created after preview: same id, with this content:</blockquote>
<blockquote>Tips'n Tricks->one liner: unix quoting with no qualifiers to stmnt that "This will print Hello oneliner in command line."<br>
Nope; it will print the Hello oneliner on the command line ONLY so long as the CLI is nix-=ish.<br>
<p>Tutorial: "Introduction<br>
PERL - Practical Extraction and Reporting Language<br>
You do know that's a backronym, right?</p>
<p>Tutorial (again): "File Handling" ...<br>
No example of 3 arg open?</p>
<p>News: First item is announcement of the site by an individual wasting huge amounts of resources here?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Update: </b>Thanks to [tye] for the fix; 2nd blockquoted content above posted as intended now.</update>
<p>OTOH, you've done some neat stuff to render additional detail about examples, just for instance... So work on the content.</p>
<p>Also noticed that BrowserUK has posted a node sometime today (lost its id; sorry) saying, loosely paraphrased, <i>Ignore this; PM is all screwed up....</i></p>