Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^12: regexp class (no bugs)

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Sep 19, 2011 at 16:09 UTC ( [id://926773]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^11: regexp class (no bugs)
in thread re: regexp class

If a product is alleged to have feature X

Alleged? By whom? When? On what basis? And whom alleges that someone alleged that the product had this feature?

The problem with not intelligently differentiating between missing features and bugs, is that it makes it impossible to prioritise properly.

A bug is (should be) a higher priority than a missing feature. It is something that prevents an implemented feature from being useful until it is fixed.

A missing feature is lower priority because if the bugs in the implemented code are fixed, a less featured product may still be useful and shippable.

And that pretty much addresses your "dependant feature" argument. If an implemented feature doesn't work without an unimplemented feature, then both are miss-categorised. The dependent isn't complete, so is not yet an implemented feature. And the dependency is not a feature, but an unimplemented subset of the dependant feature's functionality.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: regexp class (no bugs)
by jdporter (Paladin) on Sep 19, 2011 at 18:07 UTC
    Alleged? By whom? When? [etc.]

    Exactly right. Hence, there is some grey area, due to the vagueness of "alleged". At least we agree on that point.

    The problem with not intelligently differentiating between missing features and bugs, is that it makes it impossible to prioritise properly.
    A bug is (should be) a higher priority...
    A missing feature is lower priority...

    That's not particularly controversial, but it presumes that "bug" and "missing feature" can always, necessarily, be differentiated. I.e. it's premised upon you being right when you say "a missing feature is not a bug."

    And that pretty much addresses your "dependant [sic] feature" argument.

    It wasn't an argument, it was a mere observation.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://926773]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-29 12:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found