|
|
|
| laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^3: The recent spam waveby BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
| on Sep 02, 2011 at 19:40 UTC ( [id://923916]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
until their first post has been approved. No. Or at least that is not what I meant. I've seen some of the more carefully constructed spam nodes approved. It seems that if the first sentence scans as a legitimate question, people wiil often approve without reading further. But to reply, you usually have to have read the post more carefully. That's why I would use that as the criteria. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||