http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=889742


in reply to Transpose guitar chords

Your code doesn't look inelegant to me. However, you've made a very significant simplifying assumption in your code sample, namely that each tone in the 12 tone scale has exactly one letter note value.

As you know, many notes in the 12 scale have in fact two letter representations (Bb=A#, E#=F, E=Fb, and so on). After you have transposed the note, converting it back into letter values (natural, sharp, flat) requires knowing not just the shift, but also the intended key signature. Otherwise you have no way of knowing if you need D# or Eb. Therefore the "amount" parameter is not enough to print out transposed chords. My own attempt taking into account key signatures might look something like this:

my %Tone =( A => 0, B => 2, C => 3, D => 5, E => 7, F => 8, G=>10); my @Notes; foreach my $natural ('A'..'G') { my $i = $Tone{$natural}; my $iFlat = $i ? $i-1 : 11; $Tone{$natural.'#'} = $i+1; $Tone{$natural.'b'} = $iFlat; $Notes[$iFlat][0]=$natural.'b'; $Notes[$i][0] = $natural; $Notes[$i][1] = $natural; $Notes[$i+1][1]=$natural.'#'; } #print "Tone: ". Dumper(\%Tone); #print "Notes: ". Dumper(\@Notes); sub transpose { my ($key, $aChord, $toKey) = @_; my @aTransposed; my $iShift = $Tone{$toKey} - $Tone{$key}; my $iIndex = ($toKey =~ /^F|.b$/) ? 0 : 1; # F uses flats push @aTransposed, $Notes[($Tone{$_}+$iShift) % 12][$iIndex] for @$aChord; return \@aTransposed; } # demo local $"='-'; for ('A'..'G','Eb','Bb') { print "C-E-G => $_ : @{transpose('C',[qw(C E G)],$_)}\n"; } # which outputs C-E-G => A : A-C#-E C-E-G => B : B-D#-F# C-E-G => C : C-E-G C-E-G => D : D-F#-A C-E-G => E : E-G#-B C-E-G => F : F-A-C C-E-G => G : G-B-D C-E-G => Eb : Eb-G-Bb C-E-G => Bb : Bb-D-F

Note: I only eyeballed the chords - I'm not super good with purely written chords and didn't check my work on the keyboard, so if you see a mistake I apologize in advance.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Transpose guitar chords
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 27, 2011 at 17:56 UTC
    This is only correct for major mode. Minor key signatures reverse the use of sharps and flats.

      Good point. You are right that the code above is only for major keys.

      Minor keys are a bit more complex though than "reverse the use of sharps and flats". For the minor scales, only D,G switch from flats to sharps. F and all flat keys (Ab,Bb, etc) uses flats in both major and minor modes. B,E and all sharp keys (A#,B#,etc) use sharps for both major and minor modes. A goes from sharps to all naturals, and C goes from all naturals to flats. See Key signature.

      So here is the script revised to take into account minor keys as well as major keys (changes marked with <== ):

      use strict; use warnings; my %Tone =( A => 0, B => 2, C => 3, D => 5, E => 7, F => 8, G=>10); my @Notes; foreach my $natural ('A'..'G') { my $i = $Tone{$natural}; my $iFlat = $i ? $i-1 : 11; $Tone{$natural.'#'} = $i+1; $Tone{$natural.'b'} = $iFlat; $Notes[$iFlat][0]=$natural.'b'; $Notes[$i][0] = $natural; $Notes[$i][1] = $natural; $Notes[$i+1][1]=$natural.'#'; } #print "Tone: ". Dumper(\%Tone); #print "Notes: ". Dumper(\@Notes); sub transpose { my ($key, $aChord, $toKey) = @_; my @aTransposed; my $bMinor = $key =~ /m$/ ? 1 : 0; # <== $key= $key =~ /^(.*)m$/ ? $1 : $key; # <== $toKey= $toKey =~ /^(.*)m$/ ? $1 : $toKey; # <== my $iShift = $Tone{$toKey} - $Tone{$key}; my $iIndex = $bMinor # <== ? ($toKey =~ /^(?:C|D|F|G|.b)$/ ? 0 : 1) # minor key : ($toKey =~ /^(?:F|.b)$/ ? 0 : 1); # F uses flats in major push @aTransposed, $Notes[($Tone{$_}+$iShift) % 12][$iIndex] for @$aChord; return \@aTransposed; } # demo local $"='-'; print "Major modes\n"; for ('A'..'G','Eb','Bb', 'D', 'E') { print "C-E-G => $_ : @{transpose('C',[qw(C E G)],$_)}\n"; } print "Minor modes\n"; for ('A'..'G','Eb','Bb', 'D', 'E') { print "C-Eb-G => $_ : @{transpose('Cm',[qw(C Eb G)],qq{${_}m})}\n"; } # outputs Major modes C-E-G => A : A-C#-E C-E-G => B : B-D#-F# C-E-G => C : C-E-G C-E-G => D : D-F#-A C-E-G => E : E-G#-B C-E-G => F : F-A-C C-E-G => G : G-B-D C-E-G => Eb : Eb-G-Bb C-E-G => Bb : Bb-D-F C-E-G => D : D-F#-A C-E-G => E : E-G#-B Minor modes C-Eb-G => A : A-C-E C-Eb-G => B : B-D-F# C-Eb-G => C : C-Eb-G C-Eb-G => D : D-F-A C-Eb-G => E : E-G-B C-Eb-G => F : F-Ab-C C-Eb-G => G : G-Bb-D C-Eb-G => Eb : Eb-Gb-Bb C-Eb-G => Bb : Bb-Db-F C-Eb-G => D : D-F-A C-Eb-G => E : E-G-B

      And should anyone else see room for improvement, please post!

        Right, sorry, I should have said, sometimes reverse the use of sharps and flats. Another nice improvement would be to handle chord names in full generality, including minor chords, augmented, diminished, etc . This is mostly a matter of allowing suffixes after the sharp or flat notation, in the typical form, e.g. G sharp minor half diminished seventh is G#m7(b5). I think you'd just have to take everything after the A-G(#|b)? and just carry it through the transposition.