Re^3: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks

Re^3: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)

by tye (Sage)

on Feb 02, 2011 at 06:27 UTC ( [id://885669]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)
in thread RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)

The link to browsershots? That was quite interesting and seemed quite useful. It certainly showed similar bad rendering to what I saw (and informed luis.roca of prior to his posting). How does that look like spam to you?

Comment on Re^3: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots) by cjb (Friar) on Feb 02, 2011 at 11:50 UTC
I suspect that fact that browsershots is surrounded on 3 sides by flashing / blinking / animated adverts might be part of it. Once you get round them (in my case, finally installing adblock for chrome), it's not a bad site and potentially very useful	[reply]
Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots) by jdporter (Paladin) on Feb 02, 2011 at 12:24 UTC
ok, turns out it was all the ads, I never even saw the intended content. (was on a computer at work with no ad-blocking software.) yes, it is quite cool indeed.	[reply]
Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots) by fisher (Priest) on Feb 03, 2011 at 11:03 UTC
that link (browsershots) leads to an empty site in my case. I suspect Adblock plus =)	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://885669]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-04-19 21:33 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found