laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: RFC: Tutorial "Introspecting your Moose code using Test Point Callbacks"by ait (Hermit) |
on Jan 03, 2011 at 00:26 UTC ( [id://880106]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Thanks again for your valuable input. I will definitely consider your functor recommendation. Regarding the use of callbacks to test or diagnose specific spots inside a function, do you see any situation where it can be useful? Or do you consider that it always boils down to a design or refactoring issue? Lastly, did my comments on these sub-tests as a way to diagnose a failed test make any sense?
In Section
Meditations
|
|