Re^13: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required

All you did was rewrite my code in in a totally incomprehensible and incompatible way

Just like you had problems understanding my style, I had problems understanding yours.

Oh contriare!. I understood your "style". Hence my characterisation.

All hail BrowserUk, understander of the "totally incomprehensible".

--
A math joke: r = | |csc(θ)|+|sec(θ)|-||csc(θ)|-|sec(θ)|| |
Online Fortune Cookie Search

Comment on Re^13: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^14: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required by Anonymous Monk on Dec 26, 2010 at 03:58 UTC
All hail ysth, master of the burn, holy flame extender, example for all to follow	[reply]
Re^14: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required by Anonymous Monk on Dec 26, 2010 at 09:04 UTC
You see some conflict between understanding his "style", and finding the code it produces incomprehensible. Perhaps English isn't your first language?	[reply]
Re^15: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required by ysth (Canon) on Dec 26, 2010 at 23:35 UTC
In context (ikegami being certain he'd solved the Understanderer's problem, the Understanderer being equally certain he hadn't), it was clearly a claim that the "incomprehensible" was Understood. -- A math joke: r = \| \|csc(θ)\|+\|sec(θ)\|-\|\|csc(θ)\|-\|sec(θ)\|\| \| Online Fortune Cookie Search	[reply]
Re^16: 64-bit *nix/gcc expertise required by Anonymous Monk on Dec 27, 2010 at 00:01 UTC
Now that is truly incomprehensible. Why not just give ikegami a cuddle. He might just respond in kind.	[reply]