Re^4: Site facelift?

in reply to Re^3: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?

These examples are for media companies and advertising websites, nobody thinks perlmonks should look like that.

Least of all me. I've spent years designing for entertainment industry clients. Projects like PerlMonks.org is just the kind of refreshing change I've been looking for. I posted my portfolio simply as proof that I am who I say I am. NOT as a suggestion that PerlMonks should be designed using Nickelodeon orange with a giant space robot intro animation.

Now, a flying monk Flash intro — hmmmmmmm — maybe. ;)

"...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote

Comment on Re^4: Site facelift?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Site facelift? by ww (Archbishop) on Nov 19, 2010 at 22:44 UTC
Please! NO Flash Bandwidth hogging; exploitable.	[reply]
Re^6: Site facelift? by luis.roca (Deacon) on Nov 20, 2010 at 02:42 UTC
NO Flash You're preaching to the choir. (at least with me.) I've never liked Flash. Even when it cost me freelance work, I just fought harder for the HTML/CSS jobs. I would n e v e r do this site, it's member and myself such a disservice. "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote	[reply]
Re^7: Site facelift? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 20, 2010 at 02:47 UTC
What about HTML5/Canvas? >;)	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion