Re^16: eval to replace die?

In not so many words, your position amounts to: If it ain't object-oriented, it ain't right.

No, it's not. If you think that's the point I'm trying to make, it's better to end the discussion here.

Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- Aleister Crowley

Comment on Re^16: eval to replace die?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^17: eval to replace die? by Anonymous Monk on Oct 05, 2010 at 23:58 UTC
No, it's not. If you think that's the point I'm trying to make, it's better to end the discussion here. I say if you guys keep going, I'll keep reading, with dictionary in hand :)	[reply]