Re: What is the scope of Perl Monks?

IMHO, it would be ok to post such questions here. In case it should get out of hands one day (volume-wise), we can still start thinking about creating new sections... Also, people can always prefix their subject line with something like [Rakudo] to avoid confusion.

Comment on Re: What is the scope of Perl Monks? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: What is the scope of Perl Monks? by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 27, 2010 at 18:02 UTC
Given that many questions appear to be from folks still stuck on 5.8 (or 5.10), one might expand on almut's thought about labeling: label not just language, but also version, e.g., `HoH error messages [ Rakudo 0.21 ]` or `Unexpected match (non-greedy) [ 5.8.8 ]` perhaps? Rationale: the answers which offer a (pick a vers) solution only to receive a counter-answer to the general effect of 'but I can't do that; I'm running (some other vers).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: What is the scope of Perl Monks? by McDarren (Abbot) on Apr 28, 2010 at 01:40 UTC
`Rakudo 0.21 ] or Unexpected match (non-greedy) [ 5.8.8 ] perhaps?` [download] That could work well. I can just picture it.... URgenT hElp pLZ!!! `[5.8.8]` grin	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: What is the scope of Perl Monks? (U GOTTA SAVE ME ON THIS COBOL PROBLEM) by ww (Archbishop) on Apr 28, 2010 at 01:48 UTC
Shouldn't that be: "UR6en7 h3lp pLZ!!! 5.ate.ate"? :-)	[reply]


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks