Re^2: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?

in reply to Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
in thread Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?

Thanks but even stripping it down to not running through Test::Pod::Coverage is still not behaving as I'd expect from the docs. This is the plain PCM behavior-

perl -MPod::Coverage::Moose -le '$pcm = Pod::Coverage::Moose->new(pack
+age => "IsMoose"); print $pcm->uncovered'
# Prints nothing...
[download]

I expect it to show moo and cow both as uncovered. :( I really like the idea of this module and I'd love to be able to get it to give "real" feedback about Moose attributes/methods.

Comment on Re^2: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 24, 2010 at 08:07 UTC
I been experimenting with this all day. What has been happening, for me at least, is that I've been adding things that I knew were covered then I'd call `$pcm->covered`. The module prints out all the methods that are covered and returns 1. On the other hand, when I call `$pcm->uncovered` on the things I knew to be uncovered, the module returned undef---it didn't print. I was expecting it to return the uncovered handles. The joys of "PEBKAC hell":).	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 24, 2010 at 08:07 UTC

$pcm->covered

$pcm->uncovered

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom