Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?

I ran the tests, and they passed. I ran this script to see if it was working or not. I tested it with all the handles. The only one that really didn't work was why_unrated.

#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;
use Pod::Coverage::Moose;

my @mods = (
    'Moose',                
    'Pod::Coverage::Moose', 
    'Moose::Test',          
    'MooseX::Types',
    'Moose::Micro',
    'MooseX::Method'
);
foreach my $mod (@mods) {
    my $pcm = Pod::Coverage::Moose->new( package => $mod );
    print 'Coverage: ', $pcm->coverage, "\n";
}
[download]

Comment on Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Feb 23, 2010 at 18:00 UTC
Thanks but even stripping it down to not running through Test::Pod::Coverage is still not behaving as I'd expect from the docs. This is the plain PCM behavior- `perl -MPod::Coverage::Moose -le '$pcm = Pod::Coverage::Moose->new(pack +age => "IsMoose"); print $pcm->uncovered' # Prints nothing...` [download] I expect it to show `moo` and `cow` both as uncovered. :( I really like the idea of this module and I'd love to be able to get it to give "real" feedback about Moose attributes/methods.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 24, 2010 at 08:07 UTC
I been experimenting with this all day. What has been happening, for me at least, is that I've been adding things that I knew were covered then I'd call `$pcm->covered`. The module prints out all the methods that are covered and returns 1. On the other hand, when I call `$pcm->uncovered` on the things I knew to be uncovered, the module returned undef---it didn't print. I was expecting it to return the uncovered handles. The joys of "PEBKAC hell":).	[reply] [d/l] [select]


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks