Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: A better implementation of LCSS?

by gmargo (Hermit)
on Jan 27, 2010 at 16:04 UTC ( [id://819956]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to A better implementation of LCSS?

I think it's inadvisable to use the Perl-5.10-specific operator //= in some code you want to share with the world.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: A better implementation of LCSS?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 27, 2010 at 16:28 UTC

    Good point! Easily changed.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^2: A better implementation of LCSS?
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 27, 2010 at 16:07 UTC
    No, no its not :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://819956]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (1)
As of 2024-04-25 04:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found