Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^2: XML Simple

by jettero (Monsignor)
on Jan 25, 2010 at 21:29 UTC ( #819590=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: XML Simple
in thread XML Simple

I like the look of XML::Rules, but I read the pod, rather than searching here. It looks like a smarter attempt at what I was going for in CQ.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: XML Simple
by Jenda (Abbot) on Jan 25, 2010 at 23:42 UTC

    There's a few examples on PerlMonks and the explanation of the ideas that brought it to life. It seems to get to what you were after from a different angle and as such is probably better in different cases. In case you want just a fairly small subset of the data in the XML and XPath is a good way to select what you want, then CQ will most likely work better :-) If on the other hand you want a bigger part of the data and the resulting structure is more complex then the XML::Rules' style will probably end up being more readable. Plus it allows you to execute code at any level to trim or massage the data structure further.

    Enoch was right!
    Enjoy the last years of Rome.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://819590]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (4)
As of 2021-03-02 06:05 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favorite kind of desktop background is:

    Results (38 votes). Check out past polls.