Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Where did HTML::Sanitizer go?

by redgreen (Priest)
on Nov 17, 2009 at 01:53 UTC ( [id://807592]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Where did HTML::Sanitizer go?

You also might want to consider http://tidy.sourceforge.net/ for cleaning up your HTML.

While not a perl solution, it does bring some sanity to HTML tag soup.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Where did HTML::Sanitizer go?
by wazoox (Prior) on Nov 17, 2009 at 10:41 UTC
    Well it's not the same usage. I use HTML Tidy all the time for static HTML code, but HTML::Sanitizer looked like a really great solution to "purify" input.
Re^2: Where did HTML::Sanitizer go?
by grantm (Parson) on Nov 17, 2009 at 21:09 UTC
    Another option for tidying the HTML before sanitising it is XML::LibXML. It has a parse_html method that gracefully copes with mismatched tag nesting, broken quoting and other common offences. You can then use the toStringHTML method to produce nice clean HTML.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://807592]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-19 11:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found