Re^2: pack auto-chomps/chops?

Ah, that's tricky. I suppose you're right, though. Do you know if there's a web-browsable version of the Perl source code anywhere I could check into that?

By the way, your solution works but is slower than just appending a "\n" to the end during the final map.

print pack("A25",pack("V*",map{1919242272+$_}(34481450,-49737472,6228,0,-285028276,6979,-1380265972)))

Comment on Re^2: pack auto-chomps/chops? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: pack auto-chomps/chops?
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 07, 2009 at 19:18 UTC

your solution works but is slower than just appending a "\n" to the end during the final map

If pack is faster — seems odd — you could use Z instead of A.

Ah, that's tricky. I suppose you're right, though. Do you know if there's a web-browsable version of the Perl source code anywhere I could check into that?

http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git Look for pp_unpack in pp*.c (~~probably pp.c~~ specifically pp_pack.c).

The relevant code:

1458                     for (ptr = s+len-1; ptr >= s; ptr--)
1459                         if (*ptr != 0 && !isSPACE(*ptr)) break;
1460                     ptr++;
[download]

and

#define isSPACE(c) \
        ((c) == ' ' || (c) == '\t' || (c) == '\n' || (c) =='\r' || (c)
+ == '\f')
[download]

\s

Update: Added relevant code.

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

Re^4: pack auto-chomps/chops?

by bv (Friar) on Oct 07, 2009 at 20:04 UTC

Thanks, that really helps clear it up. As far as speed goes, I increased my data set and the 3 solutions (pack-and-append, pack-with-Z, and substr) are very tightly tied. I'll go with the Z approach for my final code.

print pack("A25",pack("V*",map{1919242272+$_}(34481450,-49737472,6228,0,-285028276,6979,-1380265972)))

[reply]
[d/l]


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks