Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: Partial extractions on hashes

by davorg (Chancellor)
on May 11, 2001 at 16:55 UTC ( #79693=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (jeffa) Re: Partial extractions on hashes
in thread Partial extractions on hashes

Actually, I think you've got that slightly wrong. The original code says:

if(!exists $is_acct{$usershare}){

Which is searching on key - not value.

Tie::Hash::Regex still isn't a solution because I only implemented the FETCH method, not EXISTS. But it wouldn't be too difficult to add that.

--
<http://www.dave.org.uk>

"Perl makes the fun jobs fun
and the boring jobs bearable" - me

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: Partial extractions on hashes
by busunsl (Vicar) on May 11, 2001 at 16:59 UTC
    You're right, the code says
    if(!exists $is_acct{$usershare}){
    but the text says:

    "3. Then I am trying to compare all of the values in @dirs against the values in %is_acct for a partial match."

    So I think he wants to match the values in the hash and not the keys.

      You're right. I was originally matching the keys, but because of the marraiges, I have to match the values.

      -OzzyOsbourne

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://79693]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2023-02-02 09:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:







    Results (17 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?