Re^2: Local for lexicals

I'm a little confused by the response. It's not the dynamic-scoping-like behaviour that's the problem—

my $x = 1;
my $f = sub { $x };
{
    $x = 2;
    print $f->(), "\n"; # => 2
}
[download]

works as desired. (I'm sure that “dynamic scoping” isn't the right term for that, but I didn't know a better.) The real difficulty (for me, anyway) is making a change in an inner scope to a lexical variable in an outer scope in such a way that the change will ‘revert’ outside that scope.

Comment on Re^2: Local for lexicals Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Local for lexicals by JavaFan (Canon) on Aug 10, 2009 at 16:08 UTC
It's not the dynamic-scoping-like behaviour that's the problem Yes, it is: The real difficulty (for me, anyway) is making a change in an inner scope to a lexical variable in an outer scope in such a way that the change will ‘revert’ outside that scope. That's the dynamic scoping you're after. Make `$x` a package variable, use `local`, and it will work the way you want. I don't see the point of making `$x` a lexical if you don't want lexical behaviour.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Local for lexicals by JadeNB (Chaplain) on Aug 10, 2009 at 16:13 UTC
I'm sorry; I know that I must be mis-using the terms, but it seems to me that what I'm looking for is not contrary to what one could expect of lexicals. Making a change in an inner scope that is ‘seen’ by an outer scope is what I mean by “dynamic scoping” (although I probably shouldn't), and that is, of course, no problem. Having changes to a variable within a scope undone at the end of that scope is just what scoping means—it seems to me that it has nothing to do with lexical vs. dynamic. Again, aside from magic that can be associated to copying, `{ my $temp = $x; $x = $new; ... $x = $temp; }` [download] does what I want, obviously without subverting Perl in XS-y ways. Is it really the case that setting aside a value to be restored at the end of scope is what is meant by “dynamic scoping”?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Local for lexicals by JavaFan (Canon) on Aug 10, 2009 at 16:22 UTC
Is it really the case that setting aside a value to be restored at the end of scope is what is meant by “dynamic scoping”? Yes. And package variables allow for dynamic scoping of their values. Lexical variables have lexical scoping. It's that simple. Perl gives you options. Want lexical scoping? Use lexical variables. Want dynamic scoping? Use package variables and local. What's the problem?	[reply]
Re^6: Local for lexicals by doom (Deacon) on Aug 10, 2009 at 21:26 UTC
Re^7: Local for lexicals by LanX (Saint) on Aug 10, 2009 at 22:12 UTC
Re^6: Local for lexicals by JadeNB (Chaplain) on Aug 10, 2009 at 16:27 UTC


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks