I agree that "no more excuses" sounds better than "new and improved excuses" or "less fattening excuses now available" or "all your excuses are belong to us", etc.

Thanks for the news.

Agreed, the user thang does seem strange, but hey, anything that has the capability, however remote, of making the resource usable shouldn't, IMO, be discounted out-of-hand.

Suffice it to say, if I ever manage to get the/my modules in a fit enough state, I shall (be attempting to) use the resource as appropriate.

Agreed, the user thang does seem strange, but hey, anything that has the capability, however remote, of making the resource usable shouldn't, IMO, be discounted out-of-hand.

This is exactly the naive black-and-white thinking I'm fighting against. The OP takes the news that there's a Windows testing environment and makes it a "no more excuses" posting. I tried to temper that black-and-white thinking, and you suggest that I "discount it out-of-hand".

Come on people. If you want to be taken seriously, recognize there's a lot between white and black. I didn't discount Adams work; in fact, I praised him for that in my post. I just pointed out that the existence of the service won't mean everyone is going to jump through the hoops and test their modules using the service. Some will, some won't.

I know you praised him [Adam] for his work - I read and agreed with, it.

The rest of your post suggested, to me, that you have, or intend to, discount the resource resulting from Adams' hard work.

Maybe less fewer sensitivities would be inflamed if the OP were to be re-titled along the lines of "One less excuse" (c/w "No more excuses") - that would bring the topic into the realms of LPF (Logic of Partial Functions aka 3 valued logic). thus removing the binary black/white nature, wouldn't it ?

Update:

Amendment for better grammar.

A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))