Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?

by dws (Chancellor)
on May 04, 2001 at 01:47 UTC ( [id://77806]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?
in thread variables not posting?

It's intended to be supported in the future, so if you don't start supporting it now, browsers which use it in the future will break your code.

Do I detect the faint scent of some large corporation sneaking this into some specification to guarantee the future obsolescence of everyone else's software? :-(

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?
by turnstep (Parson) on May 04, 2001 at 19:14 UTC

    No, it's just that the ampersand was a bad choice to use, but the original designers of cgi were doing the best they could. :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://77806]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-19 15:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found