Re (tilly) 1: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by tilly (Archbishop) on May 03, 2001 at 00:10 UTC
|
I had the pleasure of reading one of the drafts.
I have to say that it was scary how much I learned reading that.
As a random sample, bonus marks to the first person (other than merlyn and the like) who can say what ARGVOUT is used for in Perl. (Yes, it is documented.)
UPDATE
Geez, am I the only person who didn't know that off of
the top of the head? :-/ (Congrats to both strredwolf and premchai21.) | [reply] |
|
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by le (Friar) on May 03, 2001 at 00:06 UTC
|
Congratulations, merlyn.
Would I get an objective answer, if I asked if I should buy it? :-) | [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by Anonymous Monk on May 03, 2001 at 09:05 UTC
|
Does it describe the POD mini-language? (I don't think it needs to).
Does it describe the pod documents that come with perl? (I think this
would be quite helpful for beginners.) | [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by TStanley (Canon) on May 03, 2001 at 00:26 UTC
|
Congrats on your new book merlyn. Looks like its time to break out the old
credit card again :-)
TStanley
In the end, there can be only one! | [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by dirthurts (Hermit) on May 03, 2001 at 03:47 UTC
|
Great... I just ordered the 2nd edition 3 days ago. | [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by birdbrane (Chaplain) on May 03, 2001 at 17:19 UTC
|
Congrats merlyn! When newbies ask me about how to
learn perl (better), I always point them to the Llama book.
I still keep my copy close by for brain-fart emergencies
(in this job, they are quite frequent).
Keep up the good work!
bb | [reply] |
Re: It's alive, I tell you! Llama 3 is alive!
by mrmick (Curate) on May 03, 2001 at 17:38 UTC
|
Congrats merlyn !
I'm sure it will be at least as good the the previoous versions. It sure helped me when I first started learning Perl.
Mick | [reply] |