No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
Re^7: Global vs. local?by shmem (Chancellor) |
on May 29, 2009 at 18:04 UTC ( [id://766907]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
And using weird names is good for named subroutines that get autogenerated by code The question is wether it is good to name subroutines autogenerated by code in the symbol table. With a dispatch table hash you can name your subroutines by chunks of jpeg files, nice. But symbol tables are namespaces and their entries good for importing/exporting/localizing. I'd rather expect programmers to adhere to perl principles here. Q: Why do you do that?
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|