in reply to Re: Problem with tie *STDIN, 'IO::Scalar', \$text;
in thread Problem with tie *STDIN, 'IO::Scalar', \$text;
Sorry this is sorta off on a tangent, but why the hostile attitude towards subroutines?
Obviously, implicit modification of globals CAN be a Bad Thing™ if it's done in such a way that it's hard to follow, but if you're writing a small script,and pressed for time, and you're careful to document what you're doing, it's a timesaver. What other problems does it cause that I don't know about?
I've always thought of subroutines as just that - named blocks - and to me, that makes them a handy way to document or re-use code, even if they don't take args or return anything explicitly.
Have I overlooked some major diabolical evil that subroutines are capable of without knowing it? Or is my perl style just lacking for want of experience?
"All generalizations are incorrect, including this one." Anonymous
Obviously, implicit modification of globals CAN be a Bad Thing™ if it's done in such a way that it's hard to follow, but if you're writing a small script,and pressed for time, and you're careful to document what you're doing, it's a timesaver. What other problems does it cause that I don't know about?
I've always thought of subroutines as just that - named blocks - and to me, that makes them a handy way to document or re-use code, even if they don't take args or return anything explicitly.
Have I overlooked some major diabolical evil that subroutines are capable of without knowing it? Or is my perl style just lacking for want of experience?
"All generalizations are incorrect, including this one." Anonymous
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Problem with tie *STDIN, 'IO::Scalar', \$text;
by LunaticLeo (Scribe) on Apr 30, 2001 at 20:36 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom