Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks

Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?

by renodino (Curate)

on May 08, 2009 at 17:39 UTC ( [id://762890]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Is there a better way to learn Tk?

As others have mentioned, Perl/Tk may not be your best solution. Have you considered Tkx ? IIRC, our friends at ActiveState are pretty actively maintaining/using it.

As for books, "Mastering" is the best bet; I once saw "Learning" described as "quite possibly the nadir of O'Reilly books"...and I concur.

Perl Contrarian & SQL fanboy

Comment on Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is there a better way to learn Tk? by pobocks (Chaplain) on May 09, 2009 at 05:52 UTC
Do you know what the performance/requirements difference between the two packages is, by any chance? What I can find seems to indicate that Perl/Tk directly wraps the C code for Tk, whereas Tkx wraps Tcl calls Tk. I can't imagine that not causing some performance difference. `for(split(" ","tsuJ rehtonA lreP rekcaH")){print reverse . " "}print "\b.\n";`	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Is there a better way to learn Tk? by Anonymous Monk on May 09, 2009 at 06:23 UTC
perl/Tk is probably faster, but Tkx is more up to date in terms of features/widgets and will run on perl 5.6.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://762890]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others surveying the Monastery: (2)

As of 2024-04-25 22:44 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found