Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

Re: Benchmarks of XML Parsers

by samtregar (Abbot)
on Apr 28, 2009 at 18:25 UTC ( #760695=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Benchmarks of XML Parsers

Thanks, good stuff. If you get a chance you might throw in XML::SAX::ExpatXS, which I seem to remember was pretty fast and also has some nice SAX features the others don't.

I recently working on a project where I replaced HTML::Parser with XML::LibXML using its html parsing mode. The speed improvement was something like 10x (not sure exactly since I made a lot of other changes too).


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Benchmarks of XML Parsers
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 28, 2009 at 19:56 UTC

    Added XML::SAX::ExpatXS.

      Cool. Looks like it's still the fastest SAX parser, but that doesn't help so much when you're trying to build a tree in memory. Much faster to do it directly.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://760695]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (1)
As of 2022-05-19 03:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (71 votes). Check out past polls.