Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

by mothra (Hermit)

on Apr 24, 2001 at 21:39 UTC ( #75162=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.
in thread Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

I should have copyrighted that song sooner.

Actually you already did have it copyrighted. In both the US and Canada you become the owner of the copyright of an original work that you've created automatically.

For more deatils, start here

Comment on Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals. by fmogavero (Monk) on Apr 24, 2001 at 21:55 UTC
You are 100% correct mothra. There is a ruling in the US courts that says the only legally permissable evidence is a proof of authorship from the library of congress. That is why the old "mail yourself a copy and keep it unopened" does not work. They decided against that method. Also, I don't have the time or money to go up against a corporation. I don't know where my witnesses are at this point and I don't even think that they used more than four or five bars from it. Thanks for the link!	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Licensing and Rape-Proofing your ideals. by Anonymous Monk on Apr 25, 2001 at 22:28 UTC
But it is not a registered copyright, only implied and you have to prove it is your work, original, and created/published before the alleged infraction or the work.	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://75162]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others studying the Monastery: (5)

As of 2022-05-20 07:52 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Do you prefer to work remotely?

Results (73 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices^?