in reply to Re^3: disappearing segfault
in thread disappearing segfault
1. Comment not previously mentioned, or, I would think, safely assumed. Magic is secret until proven otherwise ;-)
2. In the future, please warn other monks that they're entering a socratic dialogue zone, wherein the reasonable assumption that people mean what they say isn't valid. Otherwise, you're basically baiting a rhetorical trap with flawed arguments, then declaiming as unsophisticated those who take them in the spirit that custom and logic suggests be the default reading.
Maybe just a line reading: "Socrates sez," or an ASCII graphic of Admiral Ackbar.
To make sure I'm being perfectly clear: I'm not (nor ever really was) indignant at you for either the first comment or this one; I just think that, intentionally or no, you're basically lecturing people for taking your statements in good faith, who have no reason to do otherwise.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^5: disappearing segfault
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 13, 2009 at 06:47 UTC | |
by pobocks (Chaplain) on Mar 14, 2009 at 05:13 UTC |