Re^3: Is there a way to access the name under which a subroutine was first defined?

seem to rely on one or more B:: modules.

What issue do you have with B? B is an interface to the guts, something you will have to access in this case. Whether B is used or not, the same code will get executed one way or another to get the info you want.

Comment on Re^3: Is there a way to access the name under which a subroutine was first defined?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Is there a way to access the name under which a subroutine was first defined? by ELISHEVA (Prior) on Feb 16, 2009 at 10:43 UTC
No issue with `B::` - just had never looked at the core list carefully enough to notice that the many of them were part of it. I'm forever learning new things about Perl. But would `B::` help where `Devel::Peek` did not (in the `MODIFY_CODE_ATTRIBUTES` sub)? What core `B::` modules would you suggest I study? Best, beth	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Is there a way to access the name under which a subroutine was first defined? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 16, 2009 at 10:47 UTC
I don't know the answer to the underlying question, so I can't answer these questions.	[reply]


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks