|
|
|
| more useful options | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: Bug in substitution operator?by polettix (Vicar) |
| on Jan 10, 2009 at 20:57 UTC ( [id://735430]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
The actual substitution isn't important in the original post; the fact is that using braces to enclose the substitution part leads to some behaviour that's not what I expected.
As you may see in the OP, I already found a solution/workaround to get what I wanted (i.e. using square brackets instead of braces); what I'm asking here is if this behaviour is buggy or not. perl -ple'$_=reverse' <<<ti.xittelop@oivalf Io ho capito... ma tu che hai detto?
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||