Allowed HTML tags

I've added <abbr title="..."> to Perl Monks Approved HTML tags and (somewhat more reluctantly) PerlMonks Approved Chatter HTML Tags. Any suggestions for other HTML tags that would be harmless to allow? Please do a search before answering; revisiting old controversies would be pointless, as I'm only interested in the non-controversial.

--
Online Fortune Cookie Search
Office Space merchandise

Comment on Allowed HTML tags Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Allowed HTML tags by parv (Parson) on Nov 27, 2008 at 09:47 UTC
Could we get a "bq" or "q" as an alias for "blockquote"?	[reply]
Re^2: Allowed HTML tags by ambrus (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2008 at 10:32 UTC
Definitely not "q", because "q" is a real html tag that's currently not allowed but only because the gods think it has poor browser support, so it might be reenabled again when everyone uses browsers that support even all the new HTML 5 tags.	[reply]
Re^3: Allowed HTML tags by JavaFan (Canon) on Nov 27, 2008 at 11:42 UTC
Well, `<code>` is a real HTML tag as well, and that didn't stop perlmonks from turning it into something different.	[reply]
Re^4: Allowed HTML tags by ww (Archbishop) on Nov 27, 2008 at 11:57 UTC
Re^5: Allowed HTML tags by JavaFan (Canon) on Nov 27, 2008 at 12:10 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^5: Allowed HTML tags by Anonymous Monk on Sep 27, 2013 at 05:47 UTC
Re^2: Allowed HTML tags by Lawliet (Curate) on Nov 27, 2008 at 20:28 UTC
I second this motion. It gets annoying to keep typing the whole word. I'm so adjective, I verb nouns! chomp; # nom nom nom	[reply]
Re: Allowed HTML tags by grinder (Bishop) on Nov 27, 2008 at 22:17 UTC
Coming from the semantic markup school of thought, I'm rather partal to `<cite>` myself. . • another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Allowed HTML tags by hangon (Deacon) on Nov 28, 2008 at 09:44 UTC
I agree, <bq> for <blockquote>. Also, is there any chance of disabling <pre> tags for newbies and anonymous?	[reply]