Re^2: Testing Perl files rather than modules


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Testing Perl files rather than modules

by Erez (Priest)

on Sep 17, 2008 at 07:55 UTC ( [id://711915]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Testing Perl files rather than modules
in thread Testing Perl files rather than modules

Also, if you are serious about testing an perl (and about testing in perl), then Perl Testing: A Developer's Notebook(ISBN 9780596100926) is, IMO, a must.

Stop saying 'script'. Stop saying 'line-noise'.
We have nothing to lose but our metaphors.

Comment on Re^2: Testing Perl files rather than modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Testing Perl files rather than modules
by jvector (Friar) on Sep 17, 2008 at 23:30 UTC

I too have had a recent epiphany "must get serious about testing". So I bought this book too.</p.

And I was left with "... but how do I get "there" from "here"??. Because it does tend to start with

use YourMod::YourStuff;

... which is not very handy if you are not in a modularized position to begin with.

I got a great tip from gabszab which suited my current situation (big monolithic CGI script), which was 'invoke the whole thing from your test and use cmp_ok', but that's another subject (although it might help in our situation?).

This signature will be ready by Christmas

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom