in reply to Re^3: RFC: Accelerated stepping
in thread RFC: Accelerated stepping
Oh, I think it's a good idea to change the source. In terms of backward compatibility you've still got 's' (step into), while the 'n' (next statement) is always a pain when 'n'-ing over sort and map blocks. Of course you can 'c' (continue) to a new location (line), but then you have to stop, break your flow, and work out where you want to go specifically. It's nice to see someone prepared to delve into those murky depths to fix this behaviour to be more intuitive at last.
Richard Foley.
ps. sry, didn't mean to post anonymously earlier :-)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^5: RFC: Accelerated stepping
by hexcoder (Curate) on Sep 07, 2008 at 19:24 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Sep 08, 2008 at 00:44 UTC | |
by hexcoder (Curate) on Sep 08, 2008 at 14:21 UTC |
In Section
Meditations