Re: Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try.

Modification of a read-only value attempted at simple.pl line 2.

Of course, you could fix that with local:
31244)){ local $_
However I suspect most people around here fear your message. JASK implies ignorance of the underlying code, which is the opposite of what this site is about.

Comment on Re: Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Many first obfuscations.. Here's my try. by one4k4 (Hermit) on Mar 28, 2001 at 05:38 UTC
I know the JASK rule. I just didnt feel like making AJAPH. :) Plus, I thought the xor against 31337 would imply the script kiddie part. That wasnt my mentality. Thanks for the `local` remark. I'm playing with some other things, and its actually helping me gain knowledge of those funny variables inside Perl. Which is the general plan anyway. _14k4 - webmaster@860.org (www.poorheart.com)	[reply] [d/l]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks