Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: LUI: Language Usage Indicators page

by arbingersys (Pilgrim)
on Mar 05, 2008 at 17:26 UTC ( [id://672221]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: LUI: Language Usage Indicators page
in thread LUI: Language Usage Indicators page

Can you tell me why you think they're silly? I realize that metrics like these only have a certain amount of value (part of the reason I try to include so many), but compared to the standard, anecdotal argument, I think they're at least better than that. Or at least they augment that. I think the anecdotal side is important as well.

Is there a particular metric you don't like? If so, why? I'm happy to weed any that are truly unimportant.

A blog among millions.
  • Comment on Re^2: LUI: Language Usage Indicators page

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: LUI: Language Usage Indicators page
by roboticus (Chancellor) on Mar 05, 2008 at 17:52 UTC
    Normally, you measure something so you can control it or make a decision based on it. I don't choose programming languages based on their popularity, and I can't think of anything I'd do that would be different because some popularity index changed.

    'Course, it's your time to waste! ;^)

    ...roboticus

      Normally, you measure something so you can control it...

      Or, control the perception of it.

      A blog among millions.
Re^3: LUI: Language Usage Indicators page
by stiller (Friar) on Mar 05, 2008 at 17:36 UTC
    First, it's a very weak connection between what can actually be measured and what one purport to measure.

    Second, why should I even care if language X is on the rise, or decline, if it's user base or kloc is huge or miniscule?

      why should I even care if language X is on the rise, or decline, if it's user base or kloc is huge or miniscule?

      There are different reasons for different people.

      Job seekers want to know what to learn so that they can be employed. Your favorite language may be great and all, but it won't matter if no one will hire you to write in it.

      Employers want to know how to implement their next project. They want a language known by many programmers so that it's easy to find people to work on the project now and in the future.

      Hobbyists want to know where they can get support. They want a language with a strong community and good documentation so they can teach themselves and get help when they're stuck.

      There are still other reasons for other people, probably.

        Well said. You got my vote ;)

        You could also add:

        Employees who need to make the case to their possibly less informed superior why they continue to work in such an obsolete, "yesterdays news" language.

        A blog among millions.

      why should I even care if language X is on the rise, or decline, if it's user base or kloc is huge or miniscule?

      I think the broader question is, why do people care whether languages are "popular", or that its user base may be slipping? Why is this such a frequent topic of discussion? I can't say why you or anyone should care, but I do know that many people seem to.

      A blog among millions.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://672221]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-24 21:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found