Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Trolling for Worst Nodes

by KurtSchwind (Chaplain)
on Jan 11, 2008 at 12:30 UTC ( [id://661867]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Trolling for Worst Nodes

I'm not sure I agree with removing duped people, but there are a few easy ways perhaps to cut down on the 'glory' that is the worst node list.

We've already removed the negative number from people's experience and have replaced it with 'requires penance' or somesuch. I think we could do the same for these nodes. Why not just have it say something non-numeric in the worst nodes table? We also don't need to have it sorted per se. A bad node is a bad node. Does it really matter if it's the WORST of the worst nodes as compared to the SECOND worst?

Make those two changes and the worst node table is a quick ref of the worst nodes, in no particular order.

--
I used to drive a Heisenbergmobile, but every time I looked at the speedometer, I got lost.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://661867]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-19 00:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found