Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses | |
PerlMonks |
Re: CGI.pm performance issues....by damian1301 (Curate) |
on Mar 17, 2001 at 01:27 UTC ( [id://65033]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Putting in raw HTML is bound to be more errorful (if thats a word) for about 2 reasons I can think of.
1. When you put raw HTML in print statements (excluding here documents and such) you have to backslash out the quotes and anyother characters that are illegal. It is much easier to just use CGI then go through hours of HTML checking for errors. 2. CGI (the newer one) is W3 compatible or something like that. It follows the rules of W3. I dont know what else to put.. BTW, I am back! Almost a Perl hacker. Dave AKA damian I encourage you to email me
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|