Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies. | |
PerlMonks |
Re: A better rand() for Win32by pmonk4ever (Friar) |
on Sep 22, 2007 at 01:58 UTC ( [id://640469]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Thanks for contributing an interesting piece of code to the Monastery Catacombs! I will enjoy taking it apart to analyze what makes it tick!!! Education is a wonderful thing... As for the discussion which ensued from the 1st post...I am a casual observer! It started getting deep for a while...but I persevered... I will say this, I am NOT a MS fan at all, and would NOT be willing to take a security hit for a PRNG!!! No matter HOW good it is!!! Thanks again... ki6jux ps...Why did you use a Perl reserved word "die" as a variable name???...
"No trees were harmed in the creation of this node. However, a rather large number of electrons were somewhat inconvenienced."
In Section
Code Catacombs
|
|