Re^5: Can we make $& better? (need)


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks

Re^5: Can we make $& better? (need)

by demerphq (Chancellor)

on Sep 12, 2007 at 19:24 UTC ( [id://638654]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Can we make $& better? (need)
in thread Can we make $& better?

Hrm, ill have to check the code in more detail, however I'm pretty sure that /g in list context copies the string *once*, wheras /g in scalar context doesn't copy it at all. The latter I know because i "fixed" it in 5.9.5 and then had to back out the fix because it caused an unacceptable slowdown.

However as far as I know you were correct, using capturing parens will cause a copy of the full string. Ill try to follow up with more details from the code when I have more time.

---
$world=~s/war/peace/g

Comment on Re^5: Can we make $& better? (need)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Can we make $& better? (need)
by tye (Sage) on Sep 12, 2007 at 20:49 UTC

BTW, my test was to change the string used in the match and then see if $1 also changed. That isn't a perfect test because it might be that the string is copied but $1 doesn't correctly use the copy made, for example. Here is a more polished version and two sets of results:

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;

print "$] $^O\n";
for(  qw( s l sg lg )  ) {
    my $x= "-y1-y2-";
    my @y;
    $y[0]= $x =~ /(.\d)/
        if  's' eq $_;
    @y= $x =~ /(.\d)/
        if  'l' eq $_;
    $y[0]= $x =~ /(.\d)/g
        if  'sg' eq $_;
    @y= $x =~ /(.\d)/g
        if  'lg' eq $_;
    $x= ":1n:2n:";
    print "$_ ($1)\n";
}
__END__

5.006 MSWin32
s (y1)
l (1n)
sg (1n)
lg (2n)

5.008008 MSWin32
s (y1)
l (y1)
sg (1n)
lg (2n)
[download]

Which shows I'd missed the only "will copy" case in 5.6.

- tye

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom