Re: Can we make $& better?


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks

Re: Can we make $& better?

by ferreira (Chaplain)

on Sep 06, 2007 at 19:59 UTC ( [id://637521]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Can we make $& better?

You may use today the feature mentioned in Re: Can we make $& better? (no need with $^MATCH). Even with older Perls, there is Regexp::MatchContext by TheDamian. Surely, it must be the inspiration for the 5.10 feature which is probably faster because introduced to the Perl core itself.

Comment on Re: Can we make $& better?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Can we make $& better?
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 12, 2007 at 18:07 UTC

Actually this post is the first time ive even heard of Regexp::MatchContext so no it wasnt in any way the inspiration for ${^MATCH} and friends.

And actually its totally fluke that both use 'p' as the new flag, originally it was 'k' in the core implementation, which was changed to 'p' (for preserve) later on because another TheDamian module uses 'k' for special purposes.

---
$world=~s/war/peace/g

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom