Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussionby BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Aug 13, 2007 at 12:18 UTC ( [id://632190]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
... then the communication issues (which maintainability really boils down to) would have been minimized. All of my attempts to contribute to the meat of this thread are as nought as compared to the contribution of that single phrase, indeed just the parenthesised part of that phrase, though the context is helpful. I learned a while ago, somewhat less than 5 years, and entirely as a consequence of coming to this place, that it is always a good idea to review each communication to which one has contributed, at least several hours after one contibutes. And often again, a few days after that. I have often been surprised by the affect the later contributors had upon my opinions, but never more so that right now. As a complete aside, you deserve a whatever 'the poetic prose equivalent of a booker prize' is, for "... like digital free radicals in a pristine body of code.". And the fuddy dudies think that poetry reached its zenith with the Bard. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Meditations
|
|