Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Re^4: [Good news] here docs portability!

by ysth (Canon)
on Jun 17, 2007 at 07:33 UTC ( #621667=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: [Good news] here docs portability!
in thread [Good news] here docs portability!

No, you are correct; the shell's `` will prefer the builtin echo, so what I gave won't work under some shells without explicitly asking for the coreutils /bin/echo. (Wow, the POSIX standard for echo is really dumb.)
  • Comment on Re^4: [Good news] here docs portability!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: [Good news] here docs portability!
by gaal (Parson) on Jun 17, 2007 at 07:39 UTC
    As much as I like being right by accident, don't even old Bourne shells honor -e? In my original comment, I was thinking of c shells, which do not.

    But instead of relying on the system's /bin/echo, which who knows, might be broken in rusty old systems, why not use Perl for this command (since we know the user has it...)

      Broken? Per POSIX, -e is not a special flag, and should be output. With the XSI extensions, you are supposed to get \r -> CR whether you want it or not. Without XSI, the output when there are backslashes is undefined.

      So perl is the way to go.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://621667]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2021-04-20 08:37 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found