Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.

by ww (Archbishop)
on Jun 10, 2007 at 04:25 UTC ( [id://620244]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.
in thread Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.

I just tried that -- with TStanley's "Writing a module test" which is a couple days old now and with some much more elderly root nodes of my own.

No joy.

So I went to advanced search, asked for the same items with a "from perlmonks.com only" qualifier and exact phrases using root node titles again.

Again, no joy!

My little experiment may have been inadequate in many ways, especially the limited sample.

But it may be that Google's indexing of pm is painfully inadequate. Running the same experiment against some of the sites I maintain turned up no such shortcomings, even when targeting a word used exactly once in a site that's been on line for barely a week.

And while crawling the links has costs -- for pm and for the user who has to wade thru '"Re^3: blah," "Re^2: blah",' the best material, IMO, tends to be in the replies, rather than the OPs. And wading thru the OPs and their answers, seeking the relevant ones can also be painful for the seeker.

Just my .02 (two cents, tuppence... does anyone have any non-English equivalent idioms?).
  • Comment on Re^2: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Running SuperSearch off a fast full-text index.
by dewey (Pilgrim) on Jun 10, 2007 at 04:34 UTC
    I agree with the second part... some topics I want to search for may only be mentioned in the Re: nodes.

    Maybe it would be convenient if the search results page had a "link to OP" next to the Re: results?

    ~dewey
      The head node's page includes all the Re: nodes by default. I meant that Google should see a single page for each thread, rather than one starting at each subnode.
        No, not quite. It only includes three levels of replies. (This number can be increased in your preferences.) For example, the text of your node (Re^4) would not get indexed if google was limited to the root nodes.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://620244]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-19 13:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found