http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=604714


in reply to Re: diotalevi's grep
in thread diotalevi's grep

There's been no compelling reason to change it.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: diotalevi's grep
by parv (Vicar) on Mar 14, 2007 at 01:53 UTC
    Ok then; thanks much. I wanted to verify as I have been giving it (along with ack, and tcgrep) as references (for grep alternatives).

      ack is pretty neat and what I now use most of the time. I probably wouldn't have bothered to write my own version if ack had existed beforehand. I'd just have hacked on the archive reading to ack instead. I still probably will.

      ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊