The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
Re^5: Inheritance and calling a subclass method *from* a baseclass method... (rephrase)by tye (Sage) |
on Mar 04, 2007 at 13:35 UTC ( [id://603115]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I wasn't particularly confused on that point and another choice of example name wouldn't have eliminated my question: Why would you choose to write:
when it appears to be functionally equivalent to the trival and thus clearer:
- tye
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|