Re: Google "related" search bias?


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

by Anomynous Monk (Scribe)

on Jan 17, 2007 at 05:31 UTC ( [id://595026]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

http://www.google.com/search?q=velociraptors shows nothing related :(. Google hiding things from the terrified populace again, no doubt.

"terrified populace" velociraptors turns up nothing. Very, very suspicious.

Comment on Re: Google "related" search bias?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Google "related" search bias? by fizbin (Chaplain) on Jan 21, 2007 at 03:21 UTC
That's because you're using the plural. "terrified populace" velociraptor -- `@/=map{[/./g]}qw/.h_nJ Xapou cets krht ele_ r_ra/; map{y/X_/\n /;print}map{pop@$_}@/for@/` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: Google "related" search bias? by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Jan 25, 2007 at 18:06 UTC
xkcd has stuff on velociraptors terrorizing the populace -- or at least the comic's author. There's also humor about computers, math, philosophy, etc. Christopher E. Stith	[reply]
Re^3: Google "related" search bias? by Anomynous Monk (Scribe) on Jan 25, 2007 at 20:31 UTC
Also http://xkcd.org/c155.html. And on the practical side http://xkcd.org/c135.html.	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://595026]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (7)

As of 2024-04-19 16:28 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found