I cannot believe you just painted me as someone who would abuse the priveledge of a janitor. You have been resorting to some seriously low blows recently tye. Very uncool.
I want you to acknowledge that i have NEVER abused janitor privilege. Most everyone here knows that i got a bit trigger happy with /borg'ing Intrepid and i have sent some controversial private /msg's around, but don't you dare imply that i ever abused my services in the past as a janitor or ever for that matter. My comment to you was an expression of what you took away from me, not a threat to take away what i have given to you.
How dare you use that as a means to shut me up with. | [reply] |
I noted that membership in janitors is precluded by your ultimatum. I did not paint you as someone who would abuse the privilege. I noted that I couldn't take your ultimatum completely seriously because it doesn't match my impression of you. None the less, despite my personal doubt that you would abuse the privilege and me not being aware of you ever having abused the privilege (and the fact that I'd be quite surprised if I did discover that), I was indeed shocked by your ultimatum and it is so antithetical to how the site is run that I consider it incompatible with that level of privileged access.
It was your ultimatum. And you chose to make your complaint in public and with haste. So I didn't feel the ultimatum could remain a private concern to be handled with deliberation.
But, no, I don't believe you would abuse the privilege and I am not aware of you having abused the privilege.
| [reply] |
So perhaps you would be a good addition to janitors. However, we aren't looking for more janitors at this time.
What the...
IMO one should distinguish between annulling the action of firing someone, and rehiring him.
OTOH I agree that any threats uttered by that person are a reason for preventing this annullation. (ETOOMANYNEGATIVES? Well I hope my intention is still clear...) No disrespect intended to that person.
| [reply] |
